| University of Utah Research Handbook | ||
|
|
||
4.3 Proposal DevelopmentRevised 3/14/00 The proposal is the document that you use to convince the sponsor that your project should be funded. Proposals (sometimes called applications) take many forms, from very detailed 300 page responses to Requests for Proposals to one-page descriptions of what you propose to do. Proposals to many of the agencies, such as NSF and NIH, require a very specific number of pages, margin width, type size and formats. Any deviation can cause the proposal to be returned without review. Other agencies, for example, Office of Naval Research (ONR), are less structured (at least for the present. There is a body of information that a sponsor generally expects to receive through the proposal. They include:
The sponsor will generally determine what information is required. It is the responsibility of the investigator and the University to ensure that the proposal document is accurate, concise, well-prepared, responsive to the agency's instructions, and easily read and understood by the reviewer(s). Proposals submitted to federal agencies are subject to review under the False Statement and False Claims Act. Any false statement made in a proposal or report including a false claim on a budget or expenditure report is subject to federal regulations and can result in (and has on many recent occasions) a fine and/or a jail term. 4.3.1 DefinitionsThe following are definitions of terms often used when submitting a proposal or application to a government agency. These may also apply to some private sponsors. Some also contain some processing information. See specific agency guidelines for more information. Program Announcement (PA): A formal statement about a new or ongoing extramural activity or mechanism. PA may serve as a reminder of continuing interest in a research area, describe modification in an activity or mechanism, and/or invite applications for grant support. Most applications in response to PAs may be submitted for any appropriate due date and are reviewed with all other applications received at that time. Request for Applications and Requests for Proposals (RFA/RFP): A formal statement that invites grant or cooperative agreement applications in a well-defined scientific area to accomplish specific program objectives. The RFA/RFP indicates the estimated amount of funds set-aside for the competition, the estimated number of awards to be made, and the application receipt date(s). Applications submitted in response to an RFA/RFP usually are reviewed by a Scientific Review Group (SRG) convened by the awarding component that issued the RFA/RFP. Note: Specific Program Announcements (PAs), Requests for Applications (RFAs) and Requests for Proposals (RFPs) are published in the Federal Register or can be found using other sources. New Proposal/Application: An initial request for financial assistance for a project or activity that is not currently receiving support and must compete with other proposals for support. They are usually submitted on agency specified forms and in accordance with agency instructions. Competing Continuation (Renewal) Proposal/Application: A request for funding to renew, by one or more additional budget periods, an existing funded project that would otherwise expire. Competing Supplemental Proposal/Application: A request for an increase in support in a current budget period for expansion of the project's approved scope or research protocol. The request may specify budgetary changes required for the remainder of the project period as well as for the current budget period. Revised (Amended) Proposal/Application: An unfunded application that the applicant has modified following initial review and resubmitted for consideration. For example, NIH allows a maximum of two revised applications in the 2-year period dating from submission of the original, unamended application. Noncompeting Continuation Proposal/Application: A request for continuation of committed funding for the second or subsequent budget period within an approved project period. Also can be called a yearly Progress Report. Some agencies and some form of awards do not necessarily require the next year's budget amounts to be addressed. These are awards that are "under expanded authority." 4.3.2 Statement of Work/Project DeliverablesIt is critical that the statement of work be an accurate reflection of what you intend to do in the project. In a grant proposal there will be some flexibility for a research project because it is research-you don't specifically know the outcome. If a particular research design proves to be inappropriate or an outcome not forthcoming, a researcher should be able to revise the work statement without jeopardizing the funding. However, unapproved changes in the design or expected deliverables for an industrial contract will more than likely preclude reimbursement for the work carried out. As a general rule, a grant will require a detailed statement of work while a contract will require a statement of specific deliverables i.e., what does the sponsor get for its money. The statement of work/deliverables for a contract should be accurate, and not inflated. Propose what you can reasonably complete given the time and dollars allotted to the project. With the exception of ONR, most mission agencies (DOD, NASA, Energy, DARPA) use a contract as the funding mechanism. This is generally true for industry as well, although a purchase order is sometimes used. 4.3.3 Proposal Budgets4.3.3.a Cost Accounting Standards and Cost Accounting Disclosure StatementThe University of Utah is required to comply with the Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). In 1997, the University submitted a Cost Accounting Disclosure Statement informing the federal government of the processes that we use to comply with their standards on research cost accounting. It is anticipated that in the year 2000, the government will audit our statement to determine our level of compliance. There are four primary areas of concern CAS 501, 502, 505, 506. These standards require that the University maintain consistency in budgeting and expending, consistency in allocating costs to activities, accounting for unallowable costs and costing periods, whether or not federal funding is involved. These standards, along with OMB Circular A-21, State guidelines and University policy, dictate how the University budgets and expends externally supported projects, including both government and private sponsors. In unusual circumstances where costs occur that do not conform to the process described in the University's Disclosure Statement, University officials will determine the materiality in each case and make every effort to assure that an inequity does not occur to its federally and privately sponsored agreements. Criteria for determining when costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are treated either as direct cost only or as indirect costs only with respect to final cost objectives is found in the University's Cost Accounting Disclosure Statement dated 12-31-97. 4.3.3.b Allowable CostsAllowable costs are those categories of costs that can be charged to a grant or contract (i.e. salaries, equipment, travel, supplies, etc.). Certain types of costs, (i.e. cost of alcoholic beverages, etc.) are not allowable and may not be charged to a contract or grant. The tests of allowability of costs are: (1) they must be reasonable; (2) they must be allocable to the sponsored agreement under the principles established; (3) they must be given consistent treatment throughout application of those generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances; and (4) they must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in established principles or in the sponsored agreement as to types or amounts of cost items.
4.3.3.c Allocable CostsAllocable costs are those allowable costs that actually benefit the grant or contract to which they are being charged. A cost is allocable to a sponsored agreement if (1) it is incurred solely to advance the work under the sponsored agreement; (2) it benefits both the sponsored agreement and other work of the institution, in proportions that can be approximated through use of reasonable methods, and/or (3) it is necessary to the overall operation of the institution and, is deemed to be assignable in part to sponsored projects. Where the purchase of equipment or other capital items are authorized under a grant or contract, the amounts authorized for such purchases are assignable to the sponsored agreement regardless of the use that may subsequently be made of the equipment or other capital items involved. 4.3.3.d Unallowable CostsUnallowable expenses are not allocated to sponsored projects as either a direct cost or as facilities and administrative indirect costs. The costs of unallowable activities are usually treated either as part of the Other Institutional Activities (OIA) base for determining facilities and administrative indirect cost rates, or are included in an administrative cost pool, neither of which is allocated to sponsored agreements. Generally, unallowable costs include: administrative and clerical salaries, local telephone charges and installation, office supplies, memberships, and postage. If a charge is unallowable as a direct cost, it is also unallowable as a match or cost sharing. 4.3.3.e Direct CostsDirect costs are those identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity; or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs. Where an institution treats a particular type of cost as a direct cost of sponsored agreements, all costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances shall be treated as direct costs of all activities of the institution. General categories of direct costs include, but are not limited to, salaries and wages, fringe benefits, supplies, contractual services, travel and communication, equipment and computer use. Personnel Costs. These costs are for University of Utah Personnel only. Non-University of Utah personnel costs should be identified as consultants and/or independent contractors. For more discussion on salary and personnel including percent of effort, effort reporting, reassigned time, increases, and additional compensation, see Section 5.4.2 Salary and Personnel Issues.
Travel costs include expenses for transportation, lodging, subsistence, and related items incurred by employees who are in travel status on official business related to a sponsored project. Such costs may be charged on an actual basis, or on a per diem or mileage basis in lieu of actual costs incurred subject to the maximum amounts specified in the current Schedule of Allowable Travel Rates set by the University and within the University's Travel Policy and practices consistently applied to all institutional travel activities. Reimbursement of travel costs associated with sponsored research projects must comply with all provisions stipulated by the sponsoring agency, or with all provisions of the University's travel policy if more restrictive. Funds can be requested for travel to scientific meetings, to conduct fieldwork, to collaborating laboratories and for consultation with the funding agency or with colleagues concerning project research. Travel costs are divided into two categories:
For a proposal budget, estimated cost should normally include air fare or other mode of transportation, the number of days of per diem, and ground transportation in accordance with University policy. Most sponsors require a statement about the purpose of the proposed travel and its relevance to the sponsored program, especially in connection with foreign travel. For more information contact the University of Utah Travel Department. Equipment (also see Section 5.4.8 Property)
Items to take into consideration with fabricated equipment:
Consultants/Professional Services A consultant is an individual hired to give professional advice or services for a fee but not as an employee of the hiring party. A consultant can be an individual or organization under agreement to provide primarily professional services (including actuarial, scientific, engineering, or technical advice) to the University in an independent contractor relationship. Consultant costs can include the consultant's travel and incidental expenses. Consultant costs can also include payments for conference or workshop speakers. Consultant and Professional Services agreements are further defined and explained in the University Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 4-14. The Principal Investigator (PI) should identify and include appropriate consultant costs as part of their proposal budget. Some sponsoring agencies limit the amount that can be paid to consultants for their time. Both NSF and the Department of Defense have limits on consultant pay. You should determine if there are limits on consultants before you submit a proposal to a sponsoring agency. Consultant costs are not excluded from the F&A calculation. Forms: Contracting for consulting and/or professional services on a sponsored research project with the University of Utah requires the completion of two forms: 1) the "Professional Services/Consulting Agreement" and 2) the "Employee vs. Independent Contractor Checklist". The forms and instructions can be found in Section 4 of the Policies and Procedures Manual and on the OSP Website. Note: If a consultant agreement is being used to pay additional compensation to a university employee, please see Section 5.4.2.e Additional Compensation in this handbook. Also use as a reference the Memorandum - Consultant or Employee: How to Tell the Difference found in the Appendix.
|
|
-- Disclaimer -- |