| |
4.2 Document Summary Sheet
Revised 9/29/00
The Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) reviews applications and
proposals only after the internal routing process is completed using a
Document Summary Sheet (DSS). The University uses the DSS to collect
needed information about proposals and to document the necessary approvals
of the proposal. No proposal may be submitted to an external sponsor
without formal approval by the University. OSP signs off on all
applications only when the internal review process has been completed. The
Director of the Office of Sponsored Projects serves as the
"Authorizing Institutional Signature (also referred to as the
"Authorized Institutional Official").
Principal Investigators (PI) complete the DSS, which includes answering
all questions and receiving all approval signatures. The DSS is then given
to OSP along with all completed sponsor forms, a final budget, a draft of
the proposal, and all completed subcontract forms and approvals. Multiple
signatures are required when a Co-PI is from another department and/or
college.
Note: Pay particular attention to the questions about Proprietary
Research and Potential Patents or Copyright. These questions are asked
because there have been numerous experiences where the investigator has
produced patentable products but has lost the ability to protect the
intellectual property because of "publication" of the grant
proposal. If a federal sponsor awards the proposal, that award may be
considered the first disclosure of invention, especially if the process is
well detailed. To protect against loss of rights, any portion of the
proposal that could be considered a "disclosure of the art" must
be marked proprietary.
A Document Summary Sheet should be completed for all new
proposals,
competing continuations and revised
proposals. Some competing supplemental
proposals may also need a DSS. An OSP administrator should be consulted in
these situations or if any other questions should arise about the DSS.
4.2.1 Approvals
By signing the DSS, the PI, Chair and Director/Dean agree to the
following:
4.2.1.a Financial:
- That you have reviewed the budget and agree
that the budget estimates are reasonably accurate and appropriate.
- That you agree with any matching and cost
sharing requirements including both cash and in-kind.
- That you agree with any commitment for shared allocation of returned
F&A (indirect costs).
- That you (your college, department) will take reasonable
responsibility for over-expenditures and/or lack of
reimbursement from the sponsor due to non-performance of the university
researcher(s).
- That no funds from the grant/contract will be
expended for general departmental operating costs or other support
unless specifically itemized and approved in the budget.
- That in the event of securing a Federal contract over $500,000 you are aware of and participate in
the process of developing and following a "Small Business Subcontracting Plan".
4.2.1.b Resources/Personnel:
- That you have agreed to any proposed space
allocation or renovation as indicated in the proposal or on the DSS.
- Individuals involved with this project and
including the PI, the Department and the College will maintain to the
best of its ability, the proprietary nature of the project if so
indicated on the DSS.
- That you agree with any commitment of time
proposed, including any proposed re-assignment from teaching during the
academic year.
- That no undergraduate or graduate student's education/research will
be compromised by his or her participation in the project.
4.2.1.c Conflict of Interest
- That you will prepare and implement a monitoring plan if there is a
conflict of interest indicated on the Document Summary Sheet or if you are
aware of a conflict of interest.
4.2.1.d Administrative
- That the Principal Investigator is eligible to
be a PI by University policies and you commit the Department/College to
supporting the project.
- That the proposal is compatible with PI's expertise and capability.
The DSS is available from OSP Web Site or from either of the two
OSP offices.
|
|